Victims of Compromise: Women and the Household Codes – Colossians 3:18-4:1 and Ephesians 5:21-33

J. Gertrud Tönsing

Abstract


This essay gives a brief overview of the authorship debate of Colossians and Ephesians, and argues that the letters, authored mainly by his co-workers, were written as an attempt to compromise between Paul’s controversial views and the congregations of Asia Minor. The household code of Colossians is analysed as a possible accompaniment to the letter to Philemon and the sending back of Onesimus, using the Pauline passage on submission in Ro- mans 13 as a basis, complemented by known Graeco-Roman traditions on the household. Slaves, and not women were the primary addressees of this probably earliest Christian household code, but undoubtedly then the status of women became an issue of contention. The essay argues that Ephesians was written as a modification to the Colossians letter, which had left out key controversial Pauline terms. The letter to the Ephesians pleads for unity, re- introduces Pauline terms in formulations acceptable to the mainstream con- gregations, and carefully formulates a position on women in the household, which was to become dominant in the early church. It is argued that the household codes were regarded as a necessary compromise at the time but were not  initially intended to suppress the participation and leadership of women. However, the controversy heated up and became more bitter, leading to the later Pastoral Letters and other early Christian writings, completely suppressing women’s leadership in the church.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Belz, Lisa Marie. “The Rhetoric of Gender in the Household of God: Ephesians 5:21-33 and Its Place in Pauline Tradition.” Loyola University Chicago ECommons, 2013. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/502 (Accessed 25 April 2020).

Best, E. “Who Used Whom? The Relationship of Ephesians and Colossians.” New Testament Studies 43, no.1 (1997): 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688500022505.

Campbell-Reed, Eileen R. “Should Wives ‘Submit Graciously?’ A Feminist Approach to Interpreting Ephesians 5:21-33.” Review and Expositor 98, no.2 (2001): 263-76.

Connock, Evan B., and Fika J. van Rensburg. “The Literary Context of the Husband-Wife Code in the New Testament.” Acta Patristica et Byzantina 12, no.1 (2001): 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10226486.2001.11745689.

De Wet, Chris L. “The Deutero-Pauline and Petrine Haustafeln: Early Christian Oikonomia, Pastoral Governmentality and Slave-Management.” Ekklesiastikos Pharos 94 (2012): 397-415.

Dudrey, Russ. “‘Submit Yourselves to One Another:’ A Socio-Historical Look at the Household Code of Ephesians 5:15-6:9.” Restoration Quarterly 41 (1999): 28-42.

Dunn, James D.G. The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon. Grand Rapids: William Eerdmans, 1996.

Han, Ho Lai. “Regressive Development of Woman’s Status in Pauline Epistles.” MA thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993.

Harris, Murray J. Colossians and Philemon. Grand Rapids: William Eerdmans, 1991.

Hooker, Morna D. “Colossians.” In Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible, edited by James D.G. Dunn, 1404-15. Grand Rapids: William Eerdmans, 2003.

Horrell, David G. “From Ἀδελφοί to οἶκος θεοῦ: Social Transformation.” Journal of Biblical Literature 120 (2001): 293-311.

Lincoln, Andrew T. “The Household Code and Wisdom Mode of Colossians.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 74 (1999): 93-112.

Lindemann, Andreas. Der Epheserbrief. Zürcher Bibelkommentare. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1985.

Lohse, Eduard. Die Briefe an die Kolosser und an Philemon. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1968.

Lu, Shi-Min. “Woman’s Role in New Testament Household Codes: Transforming First-Century Roman Culture.” Priscilla Papers 30, no.1 (2016): 9-15.

MacDonald, Margaret Y. “Beyond Identification of the Topos of Household Management: Reading the Household Codes in Light of Recent Methodologies and Theoretical Perspectives in the Study ofthe New Testament.” New Testament Studies 57, no.1 (2011): 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688510000251.

Mouton, Elna. “Reimagining Ancient Household Ethos?” Neotestamentica 48, no.1 (2014): 163-85. https://about.jstor.org/terms.

Nadine, Katinka and Ellen Evers. “A Key and Classic Text: Ephesians 5:21-33.” 2006. School of Theology and Seminary Graduate Papers/Theses, 2. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/sot_papers.

Nortjé-Meyer, Lilly and Alta Vrey. “Artemis as Matrix for a New Interpretation of the Household Codes in Ephesians 5:22-6:9.” Neotestamentica 50, no.1 (2016): 53-69.

O’Brien, Peter T. Colossians-Philemon. Word Biblical Commentary, Vol. 44. Waco: Word Books, 1982.

Osiek, Carolyn. “The Family in Early Christianity: ‘Family Values’ Revisited.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 58, no.1 (1996): 1-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43722568?seq=1.

Pervo, Richard I. The Making of Paul – Constructions of the Apostle in Early Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010.

Pokorný, Petr. Der Brief des Paulus an die Kolosser. Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament 10/1. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1987.

Sampley, J. Paul. “And the Two Shall Become One Flesh” – A Study of Traditions in Ephesians 5:21-33. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.

Schlueter, Carol J. “Revitalizing Interpretations of Ephesians 5:22.” Pastoral Psychology 45 (1997): 317-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282659.

Schnackenburg, Rudolf. Der Brief an die Epheser. Evangelisch-Katholischer Kommentar, Vol. 10. Einsiedeln: Benziger Verlag,Schüssler Fiorenza, Elizabeth. In Memory of Her – A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. New York: Crossroad Publishing, 1987.

Schweizer, Eduard. Der Brief an die Kolosser. Zürich: Neukirchener Verlag, 1976.

Standhartinger, Angela. “The Origin and Intention of the Household Code in the Letter to the Colossians.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 79 (2000): 117-30.

Syreeni, Kari. “Paul and Love Patriarchalism: Problems and Prospects.” In die Skriflig 37, no.3 (2003): 395-422.

Thompson, Marianne M. Colossians and Philemon. The Two Horizons New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: William Eerdmans, 2005. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=hynAxYW4SjAC.

Tönsing, J. Gertrud. “‘The Spirit:’ Left out and then reintroduced? A Study of Colossians 3:16 and Ephesians 5:18-19 in the context of the authorship debate.” Scriptura 119, no. 1 (2020): 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.7833/119-1-1470.

Tracy, Steven R. “What Does ‘Submit in Everything’ Really Mean? The Nature and Scope of Marital Submission.” Trinity Journal 29, no.2 (2008): 285-312.

Trull, Joe E. “Is the Head of the House at Home?” Priscilla Papers 14, no.3 (2000): 3-7.

Wilson, Robert M. Colossians and Philemon: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary. International Critical Commentary. London: T&T Clark, 2005.

Wolter, Michael. Der Brief an die Kolosser, der Brief an Philemon. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1993.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14426/ajgr.v26i1.62

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.